Lied under Oath, that apparently is what former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff is guilty of. That's a trumped up charge to fit what really happened, he said what he remembered, and reporters and others remember differently.
So, let me get this straight, we had a special prosecutor to investigate the memories of a White House staffer and the media?
Millions spent, and this is what a special prosecutor was looking into.
Remember this involved a CIA employee, who was well known for being a CIA employee, even identifying herself as one on a campaign contribution form to a political candidate, who conspired to hire her husband to write a critical report of the yellow cake conspiracy involving Iraq.
It was later revealed that she was not at risk because she wasn't undercover when her identity was revealed publicly--not by the former White House staffer, but by some other member of the administration.
Former President Bill Clinton lied under oath, it's called perjury, not involving something as insignificant as a faint memory, but an event that could have caused him to be the victim of blackmail and endangered the United States.
Clinton's Secretary of State Sandy Berger stole secret documents, and was given a slap on the wrist.
So a White House operative reveals something that EVERYONE knew, and because he's from the White House, he is persecuted and prosecuted.
Where was the investigation about the CIA employee suggesting her husband, former Ambassador Joe Wilson, to be hired to go and check out the yellow cake deal? A Clinton operative he slammed the White House and the intelligence, which was later proven to be accurate and Wilson was wrong.
Remember-----no wait-----with the example that has been set by the special prosecutor/persecutor, it's best to say, if you are ever asked by anyone about something, "I don't recall ever having a conversation involving that matter." Words to live by.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment